Clay Smith, Author at Drugbeat

21 04, 2025

CA1: Marijuana odor upheld for determination of PC, still a federal crime even though state decriminalized possession and use.

By Clay Smith|2025-04-21T15:31:11+00:00April 21st, 2025|CA1, Federal Circuits|0 Comments

United States v. Pavao: What K9 Units Need to Know About Marijuana Detection and Search & Seizure Law Introduction: Why Pavao Matters for Police K9 Search and Seizure The intersection of K9 police work and search and seizure law continues to evolve—especially in states where marijuana has been legalized or decriminalized. A recent appellate decision, United States v. Pavao (1st Cir. 2024), has reaffirmed a critical legal principle: the odor of marijuana can still serve as probable cause or reasonable suspicion, regardless of local decriminalization. For law enforcement agencies and K9 handlers, this ruling offers a solid legal foundation for [...]

15 04, 2025

CA8: K9 touching car was instinctive and not a violation US v Munoz

By Clay Smith|2025-04-18T15:16:59+00:00April 15th, 2025|CA8, Narcotics Detection, Vehicle Sniffs|0 Comments

United States v. Munoz (8th Cir. 2025) Federal Case – Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals In United States v. Munoz, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals addressed a familiar issue in K9 case law—how far is too far when a drug dog sniffs (and touches) a car during a traffic stop? The case involved three defendants—Ashley Chacon, Emiliano Nava Munoz, and Valentin Nava Munoz—who were stopped and ultimately charged with distributing massive amounts of methamphetamine. Chacon was pulled over for speeding in Iowa. During the stop, an officer asked her to sit in his patrol vehicle while he completed the [...]

6 04, 2025

Michigan Supreme Court: Smell of Marijuana Alone Not Enough for Vehicle Search

By Clay Smith|2025-04-06T19:45:07+00:00April 6th, 2025|Michigan, State Court|0 Comments

Summary and Legal Analysis: People v. Jeffery Scott Armstrong, Michigan Supreme Court (2025) Michigan Supreme Court: Smell of Marijuana Alone Not Enough for Vehicle Search Introduction In People v. Armstrong, the Michigan Supreme Court addressed a significant question in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence: can the smell of marijuana alone justify a warrantless vehicle search? This decision redefines the limits of police authority post-legalization of marijuana in Michigan. Background of the Case Jeffery Scott Armstrong was charged with firearm-related offenses after Detroit police discovered a handgun under the passenger seat of a vehicle where he was seated. The officers approached the car [...]

19 03, 2025

GA: Dog Sniff conducted prior to conclusion of stop and issuing citations.

By Clay Smith|2025-03-20T18:51:40+00:00March 19th, 2025|Georgia, Narcotics Detection, State Court, Vehicle Sniffs|0 Comments

State v. Dean, 2025 Ga. App. LEXIS 143 (Mar. 19, 2025) K-9 Case Law: State v. Dean and the Legality of Vehicle Sniffs During Traffic Stops Introduction The use of K-9 units in traffic stops has long been a subject of legal debate, particularly regarding whether their use unlawfully extends a stop. In State v. Dean (Georgia, 2025), the Georgia Court of Appeals clarified key aspects of K-9 case law, affirming that a vehicle sniff does not violate the Fourth Amendment if conducted while an officer is processing a citation. This case reinforces legal precedents ensuring that traffic stops [...]

7 02, 2025

OH5: K9 Sniff did not violate Rodriguez and no violation for handler touching vehicle to redirect dog

By Clay Smith|2025-02-07T15:34:45+00:00February 7th, 2025|Narcotics Detection, Ohio, State Court, Vehicle Sniffs|0 Comments

K9 Case Law in Ohio: State v. Bond and Its Impact on K9 Searches State v Bond Officer touching vehicle during k9 sniff to redirect dogs sniffing was not a violation. The sniff did not extend the stop in violation of Rodriguez. Introduction K9 searches and seizures remain a highly litigated issue in criminal law, especially concerning vehicle searches. The recent Ohio Court of Appeals decision in State v. Bond, 2025-Ohio-360, offers important insights into how courts analyze K9-related Fourth Amendment challenges. This case reinforces established precedents and clarifies key issues, including the duration of a traffic stop, the reliability [...]

17 12, 2024

NC: K9 Alert on vehicle did not justify search of person

By Clay Smith|2025-01-28T19:26:52+00:00December 17th, 2024|Narcotics Detection, North Carolina, Person, State Court|0 Comments

State v. Stollings, 2024 N.C. App. LEXIS 1006 (Dec. 17, 2024). "A drug dog alert on defendant’s car isn’t reasonable suspicion to frisk his person." The Case of State v. Stollings: A Critical Analysis of K-9 Use in Evidence Suppression The case of State v. Stollings serves as a pivotal moment in the evolving landscape of K9 case law, particularly in the realm of search and seizure during traffic stops. This case not only highlights the importance of adhering to constitutional standards but also underscores the necessity of clear, credible evidence when employing K9 units. Below, we dissect the key [...]

15 11, 2024

CA6: No reasonable suspicion to extend stop for sniff – Rodriguez Violation

By Clay Smith|2025-01-29T00:02:15+00:00November 15th, 2024|CA6, Federal Circuits, Federal Districts|0 Comments

United States v. Taylor, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 29055 (6th Cir. Nov. 15, 2024) Case Summary: United States v. Taylor (2024) Jurisdiction: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Decision Date: 2024 Background On January 21, 2019, Officer Kristen Cox of the Knoxville Police Department stopped Nathaniel Taylor for speeding on Interstate 275 in Knoxville, Tennessee. During the stop, Officer Cox noticed several factors she considered suspicious: Multiple Air Fresheners: She observed multiple air fresheners in Taylor's vehicle, which she interpreted as an attempt to mask odors. Criminal History: She reviewed Taylor's criminal history, which included past [...]

19 09, 2024

WY: Free Air Sniff of publicly accessible vehicle does not require RS – Free Air Sniff

By Clay Smith|2025-01-29T00:13:35+00:00September 19th, 2024|Wyoming|0 Comments

Labbe v. State, 2024 WY 99, 2024 Wyo. LEXIS 101 (Sep. 19, 2024). Wyoming Supreme Court Clarifies K9 Search and Seizure in Public Parking Lot Case The Wyoming Supreme Court recently issued a critical ruling in the case of Robert James Labbe v. The State of Wyoming (Opinion No. S-24-0038, Sept. 19, 2024). This decision sheds light on the legality of canine sniffs, Fourth Amendment protections, and law enforcement practices surrounding searches in public areas. For K9 handlers, law enforcement officers, and legal professionals, this case provides valuable insights into the interplay between free-air sniffs and search-and-seizure law. Overview of [...]

6 09, 2024

CA8: Alert style not specified by court to be upheld

By Clay Smith|2025-01-28T19:23:32+00:00September 6th, 2024|CA8, Federal Circuits, Federal Districts, Narcotics Detection, Vehicle Sniffs|0 Comments

United States v. Collier, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 22709 (8th Cir. Sep. 6, 2024). "Every dog is unique, and a dog that smells illicit drugs is not required to communicate with its handler in any specific way. … ‘Dogs alert in many different manners. One dog may alert in one manner while another dog may alert in another manner.’ … The reliability of a dog’s alert, not its manner, is what matters. See Holleman, 743 F.3d at 1156 (‘Fourth Amendment jurisprudence does not require drug dogs to abide by a specific and consistent code in signaling their sniffing of drugs [...]

27 08, 2024

TX14: Dog nose crossed the threshold – unreasonable

By Clay Smith|2025-01-29T00:28:19+00:00August 27th, 2024|Narcotics Detection, State Court, Texas, Vehicle Sniffs|0 Comments

State v. Organ, 2024 Tex. App. LEXIS 6279 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Aug. 27, 2024). Case Analysis: State of Texas v. Courtney James-Varnell Organ Introduction The case of State of Texas v. Courtney James-Varnell Organ serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing interpretation of Fourth Amendment protections, particularly regarding the role of K9 units in vehicle searches. This case addresses a critical question: Does the intrusion of a narcotics dog into a vehicle’s interior constitute an unconstitutional search? The decision by the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, Texas, clarifies the boundaries of lawful searches and highlights the [...]

About Clay Smith

Categories

Tags